Active Conversations Old Conversations The dNeero Blog Charity Reseller Program SuperPanels Sign Up Log In
PDA -- Public Displays of Affection or Just Public Displays?
Already have an account?Log In
Want to get one?Sign Up
It''s in the news ... 12 year old gets detention for hugging a friend who had recently lost a parent. Where should we darw the line?






jonald linga's answers.
How would you answer?

?Affection is responsible for nine-tenths of whatever solid and durable happiness there is in our lives.?
~ C.S. Lewis ~
 Affection :: dNeero

Rate the following on the affection scale.
1 = not at all affectionate; 5 = very affectionate

1
2
3
4
5
Peck on the cheek
X
Arm around waist
X
Arm over shoulder
X
Holding hands
X
Hug
X
Handshake
X
Kiss (lips on lips)
X
Kiss (some tongue)
X
Ass pinch
X
Ass grab
X
Slap on the rear
X
Slap on the back
X
Vulcan mind meld
X

Where would the following displays be inappropriate (choose all that aply)?

Bar
Church
Concert
Grocery store
Mall
Peck on cheek
X
Arm around waist
X
X
Arm over shoulder
X
Holding hands
Hug
Handshake
Kiss (lips on lips)
X
Kiss (tongue)
X
Ass pinch
X
Ass grab
X
Slap on rear
X
Slap on back
X

Continuing from above: Where would the following displays be inappropriate (choose all that aply)?

Movies
School
Street
Work
Sports
Peck on cheek
Arm around waist
X
X
X
X
Arm over shoulder
X
Holding hands
Hug
Handshake
Kiss (lips on lips)
X
X
X
X
X
Kiss (tongue)
X
X
X
X
X
Ass pinch
X
X
X
X
X
Ass grab
X
X
X
X
X
Slap on rear
X
X
X
X
X
Slap on back
X
X
X
X
X

Which display offends you the most?

    Peck on cheek

    Arm around waist

    Arm over shoulder

    Holding hands

    Hug

    Handshake

    Kiss (lips on lips)

  >Kiss (tongue)

    Ass pinch

    Ass grab

    Slap on rear

    Slap on back

    Other

What other question about public displays of affection would you like to see in a dNeero survey?

sex in the streets



This conversation is no longer open for respondents. However, we still have many other conversations that allow you to make money! Click the Results tab to see how people answered!

Find Another Conversation



Add to: digg | reddit | del.icio.us | yahoo!
blinklist | spurl | furl | technorati


This conversation is closed.

People who joined this conversation earned
$0.95
They also earned up to an additional $0.89 depending on their blog traffic.



Get paid to share your opinion.
We pay people to fill out conversations and post their answers to their peers.

Your answers appear on your blog
However you answer, your friends will see it. Express yourself!

You need to register and qualify to get paid
Once you answer the questions you'll need to register and fill out a short profile that asks some basic demographic questions. If you qualify for this conversation then you'll get paid.

You need to be honest
We aren't paying you for any particular opinion. We're paying you for your time and for the exposure on your blog. If you don't like a product or service you need to be honest about that fact.

Stimulate conversation
Engage companies who are actively seeking your feedback on products and services. At the same time, engage your blog readers in discussion of the same product.

No gimmicks.
This is the real deal. A simple model that respects your privacy and allows you to control what you blog about and when. We pay for activity you choose to engage in.

If you don't like this conversation
We have plenty more conversations for you to choose from. And all of them pay!

Start Date Thu, Nov 8, 2007 15:46:39
End Date Sat, Dec 8, 2007 14:42:45
Possible Pay for Conversation Response $0.95
Assuming you post your conversation and it qualifies.
Pay for 1000 Hits on Your Blog $0.89
Max Paid Hits on Your Blog 1000
Remaining Slots
0 of 250 (0%)
Up to 250 people may join.

Blog Displays to Date
34876 of 62500 (56%)
We'll pay for the first 62500 displays in blogs.

This Page Displayed 7143 times
ID 89
Referred by 1633


Copyright 2006-2008. All rights reserved. | terms of use and privacy statement | about us | oh, btw, we're evil.
At Your Service is a Server Called: WS02 which built this page in: 625 milliseconds